ABSTRACT
The
research purposes were to study the level of public mind, the relations of
comparison factors and vital predicators of the public mind of Dhonburi
Rajabhat University’s students. The case study was the Dhonburi Rajabhat University’s
students from 4 faculties totally 560 persons. The data was collected by 7 sets
which each set has 6 scores of evaluation questionnaires and each set has the
reliability (α) between .563-.925. The data was analyzed by
Two Ways Analysis of Variance and Multiple Regression Analysis in total and
stepwise form.
The
important results concluded that the level of public mind characteristics of
Dhonburi Rajabhat University’s students were; (1) In overall, usage of public
assets was at good level (x¯=4.92, S.D. =.575) (2) In overall, duty awareness
was at good level (x¯=4.71, S.D. =.573) and (3) Respect to other human’s right
was at good level (x¯=4.92, S.D. =.554). The study of the relations of
comparison factors were: (1) Students who received good social experience and
high self-control expectation would have high level of public mind. (2) Among
students who can highly self-control would perform duty at high level. (3)
Students with the high level of self-control and good social awareness
(experience) would respect the other human’s right which found from the
students of Faculty of Humanities. (4) Students with good model from
surrounding persons would have the high level of public assets responsibility
and found in the small family. (5) The students who had high level of ethics
and good model would have the high duty awareness and came from well- educated
parents’ family. (6) The students with good experience and high level of other
human’s right would be found in the majority of students. From the study of
important public minds’ predicators found that (1) The important predicators of
public assets ’usage were that the 1st set of predicators indicated that the
weight of model from surrounding persons equaled to (β).163
or 29.0 percentage. The 2nd set of predicators indicated that fundamental
experience and ethical reasons equaled to (β)
.177 and .138 respectively and percentage of predicators was 46.00. (2) The
important predicators of duty
awareness were that the 1st set of important predicators indicated that the
weight of model and mental standard equaled to (β).323
and .096 respectively and the percentage of predicator was 13.00. The 2nd set
of predicators indicated that the weight of basic experience and ethical reason
equaled to (β).352 and .108 respectively. (3) The important
predicators of other human’s respect were that the 1st set of predicators indicated that the
weight of good model from surrounding persons equaled to (β).257
or 68.00 percentage and the 2nd set indicated that the weight of basic
experience was (β).230 or 61.00 percentage.
